80 / 240 is 0.33 just over 25% so DV may be barely enough for Standard Video if using s-video

 I would still be favoring MPEG2 if using s-video with Standard VHS "just in case" and for the convenience of a dedicated capture platform like a DVR, especially one that you could directly off load the video from in MPEG-TS format.. which is more tolerant of dropouts

A full conversion to MPEG-PS for burning DVDs would be likely to introduce more compromises to maintain the stream rate required by those playback formats.

Again, MPEG4 would be preferred to that.. if available.. in a dedicated device, native operating system players will not be encumbered by long expired licensing deals for MPEG2 playback codecs and more likely to be supported by minimally featured playback devices and programs going forwards.

However, MPEG2 capture devices like DVRs are more likely to have dedicated Time Base Correction and Frame Stabilization which is now no longer features included in a purely digital age.

I am biased.. since stumbling on to the ability to offload MPEG2 TS data directly from some of the most premium DVR capture devices ever made.. shortly before they were abandoned and shelved or consigned to the dump.. but their convenience and usage demonstrated by their popularity for about ten years says a lot about their overall effectiveness.

If an MPEG2 capture device like a DVR were used as a pass-thru device to feed an MPEG4 capture device for digitization, that might be the most effective combo and future proof.. but the odds of acquiring and combining them without introducing impedance mismatches or other signal glitches and coordinating them over a long period of time would seem cumbersome.. if only theoretical.

S-Video is not S-VHS, but it can roughly double the Chroma resolution

 

estimate the improvement in chroma resolution for Standard VHS and S-VHS when using s-video.

While S-Video (Y/C) connections can significantly improve video quality compared to composite video connections for both Standard VHS and S-VHS formats, the extent of improvement in chroma resolution specifically can be challenging to quantify precisely. However, we can provide a rough estimate based on typical performance characteristics:

1. Standard VHS with S-Video:

   • Standard VHS typically offers around 30-40 lines of horizontal chrominance resolution when using composite video connections.
   • With S-Video, the separation of the luminance and chrominance signals reduces color bleeding and improves overall image clarity. It can roughly double the chrominance resolution, providing an estimated improvement of around 60-80 lines of horizontal chrominance resolution.

2. S-VHS with S-Video:

   • S-VHS offers an improvement in chrominance resolution over Standard VHS, but the exact increase can vary.
   • With S-Video, S-VHS recordings benefit from the same advantages as Standard VHS, but with a higher starting point for chrominance resolution. Therefore, the improvement in chrominance resolution with S-Video for S-VHS may be less dramatic compared to Standard VHS, but it still enhances overall color fidelity and sharpness.

Please note that these estimates are rough approximations and actual performance can vary depending on factors such as tape quality, playback equipment, and recording conditions. Additionally, the perceived improvement in video quality with S-Video connections may also depend on individual preferences and viewing conditions.

DV versus MPEG2 when converting VHS Tapes to Digital

DV uses 4:1:1 chroma subsampling. 

I had an intuitive grasp that DV would be sufficient if not overkill for converting Standard VHS tapes to digital files. I could prove it in numbers, but people continued to preach 4:4:4 was better. - I don't think oversampling the same material that far.. produces any better results and makes handling the converted files that much less likely to be copied or replicated through history.

S-VHS is a superior chroma subsampling on tape, which exceeds that of DV 4:1:1 chroma subsampling, but does not exceed that of MPEG2 4:2:2 subsampling. And direct broadcast signal conversion to digital would be even closer to 4:2:2 which is probably why it was selected for Tivo and other early Broadcast TV digital capture solutions. 4:4:4 was still not warranted however.

A more serious choice is to upgrade to Progressive or retain Field based capture and allow some future algorithm the choice to de-interlace video that has not yet been invented.. possibly even some sort of speculative A.I. de-interlacing method  that minimizes the information loss and artifacts created by early de-interlacing methods. 

Choosing how to archive video tape so that it survives into the future and holds on to as much information as its possible to capture when crossing from analog to digital is a balancing act.

The most important being Luma and Field capture then considering things like chroma sampling or whether to subsample.

In this case using 4:1:1 on Standard VHS (is not) subsampling when converting from Analog to Digital, it is over sampling.

In this case using 4:2:2 on Super VHS (is not) subsampling when converting from Analog to Digital, it is over sampling.

MPEG2 does compress Luma and Chroma for a smaller file size versus DV by a reduction in information in the noise zone of a progressive or field image.. but it is a choice.. and may make handling large video files less of a problem as is the case with DV files.

Given the success of MPEG2 at the time, it was a reasonable tradeoff and quite a success.. judging by the DVD video market of that time.

MPEG4 was introduced as a better version of MPEG2 initially for streaming and low bit rates, but later upgraded in silicon as a higher bit rate replacement for MPEG2 and does not suffer many of the artifacts of an MPEG2 video and is not license encumbered as MPEG2 became. 

Today MPEG4, overall is probably superior to DV or MPEG2 if given a good source to convert. 

However as media degrades, if a DV or MPEG2 conversion is already available, it may make more sense simply to retain that or consider placing it in an MPEG4 container form and format for playback that can conjugate but not re-encode the original digitization process without introducing new artifacts or quality degradation. this when the original source is no longer available, or had degraded further than when the first digitization methods were used.

 

An A.I. perspective on S-VHS versus 4:2:2 sampling

 is S-VHS closer to 4:1:1 or 4:2:2 ?

 

S-VHS (Super VHS) is an improved version of VHS that offers better video quality, especially in terms of resolution and color fidelity. While it's still an analog format, S-VHS does offer enhanced chroma resolution compared to standard VHS.

Here's how it compares to digital chroma subsampling formats like 4:1:1 and 4:2:2:

S-VHS Color Resolution

S-VHS improves upon standard VHS in several ways, including better color resolution. While it still uses a composite video signal,it provides an improvement over VHS in terms of resolution, offering around 400 lines of horizontal resolution for luminance and a slight improvement in chrominance resolution, though specific figures for chrominance resolution in S-VHS can vary. Some estimates suggest an increase to around 60-70 lines of horizontal resolution for chrominance.

Comparison to Digital Chroma Subsampling

When comparing to digital formats:

• 4:1:1:

  • Luma: 720 pixels per line.
  • Chroma: 180 pixels per line (a quarter of the luma resolution).

• 4:2:2:

  • Luma: 720 pixels per line.
  • Chroma: 360 pixels per line (half of the luma resolution).

Approximate Digital Equivalent

Given the improved chroma resolution of S-VHS compared to standard VHS, it falls somewhere between 4:1:1 and 4:2:2. Here's why:

• Chroma Resolution: While S-VHS offers better color resolution than standard VHS, it still falls short of the full 4:2:2 chroma resolution used in digital formats. However, it provides more detail than a mere quarter of the luma resolution, which is characteristic of 4:1:1.

Summary

S-VHS is closer to 4:2:2 in terms of effective color resolution compared to 4:1:1. While it doesn't match the full 4:2:2 resolution, its enhanced chroma resolution surpasses the quarter-luma resolution typically seen in 4:1:1 chroma subsampling. Therefore, S-VHS is closer to 4:2:2 than to 4:1:1, albeit still being an analog format with its own characteristics.

 

An A.I. perspective on Standard VHS versus 4:1:1 sampling

is standard VHS closer to 4:1:1 or 4:2:2 subsampling?

Standard VHS video quality does not directly correlate to digital chroma subsampling formats like 4:1:1 or 4:2:2 because VHS is an analog format. However, we can make an approximate comparison based on the effective color resolution and the way VHS handles color information.

VHS Color Resolution

 VHS, an analog format, uses a composite video signal where the luma (brightness) and chroma (color) signals are combined. The color resolution of VHS is significantly lower than its luma resolution. Here’s a general comparison:

• Luma (Y): VHS can resolve around 240 lines of horizontal resolution.
• Chroma (C): The color resolution of VHS is much lower, typically around 30-40 lines of horizontal resolution.

Comparison to Digital Chroma Subsampling

When comparing to digital formats:

• 4:1:1:

  • Luma: 720 pixels per line.
  • Chroma: 180 pixels per line (a quarter of the luma resolution).

• 4:2:2:

  • Luma: 720 pixels per line.
  • Chroma: 360 pixels per line (half of the luma resolution).

Approximate Digital Equivalent

Given the much lower chroma resolution of VHS, it is closer to 4:1:1 chroma subsampling rather than 4:2:2. Here’s why:

• Chroma Resolution: The color resolution of VHS is significantly reduced compared to its luma resolution, similar to how 4:1:1 reduces chroma resolution to a quarter of the luma resolution.

Summary

While VHS does not use digital chroma subsampling, its effective color resolution is more similar to the 4:1:1 digital format. The 4:1:1 subsampling method reduces chroma resolution significantly, akin to the low chroma resolution of VHS. Therefore, standard VHS is closer to 4:1:1 than to 4:2:2 in terms of effective color resolution.

 

Tracking Roth and Traditional contributions in One Retirement Account

 I am new at trying to use the "old" way and found it confusing from the Threads available.

Simply, in as few words as possible;

1. Quicken lets you set up a new account of type 401k (x) tax deferred.
2. When you setup a paycheck using
3. [BILLS & INCOME] tab > [Add v] button > "Add Income Reminder"
4. Looking down at the bottom of the dialog click on "Paycheck setup wizard"

Choose (x) Gross amount > [Next] button

Company name: "myemployer" > [Next] button

Fill out the sections for your paycheck, adding a

[Add Pre-Tax Deductions] > Other Pre-Tax Deduction

1. Name: Broker - Traditional
2. Category: replace the word "Salary" with the "[401k Account]" you set up, type but ignore the dialog that pops up > "[401k Account]/Traditional" and press enter, press [OK], ignore the [New Tag] dialog and press [Save]
3. Amount: enter an amount if you like, press [OK]

[Add After-Tax Deductions] > Other After-Tax Deduction

1. Name: Broker - Roth
2. Category: replace the blank field with the "[401k Account]" you set up, type but ignore the dialog that pops up > "[401k Account]/Roth" and press enter, press [OK], ignore the [New Tag] dialog and press [Save]
3. Amount: enter an amount if you like, press [OK]

When a paycheck is "Action > Entered" from Bills&Income, "tagged" contributions will be placed into the same 401k account; you can tell from their tags their contribution type.

My Retirement Account does not track contributions separately until withdrawl, it lumps them into a ratio between the total of each contribution type which adds up to 100 percent.

On the day of withdrawl the current contribution ratio is used to calculate the available funds of each type from the total of the balance in the account.

A report to find out the current contribution totals can be run from;

Reports > Banking > Transaction

Select [Accounts] tab > [Clear all] button, and check the account "401k account"

Select [Tags] tab > [Clear all] button, and check the tags "Roth" and "Traditional"

Press the [Show Report] button

Select the [Date range: Year to date v] pick the [Custom to Date], press [OK]

a tabulate report will appear with only the tagged transactions for the account chosen.

—

This is a work around.

The important parts are the "/Roth" and "/Tradition" tag creation and appending to the Paycheck Cash Transfer Transaction type, not all Transaction types support tags.

This workaround does not support the Tax Planning or Forecasting features of Quicken, it allows you to manually track contribution types and reconcile with some retirement plan reports.

I find it better than nothing.

A more Robust solution would be appreciated.

Windows XP Mode on Win7 with VirtualBox

 Windows XP Mode was a freely activated copy of Windows XP from 2001 that ran on Windows 7 Pro and Win 7 Ultimate in the old Connectix Virtual PC. Microsoft acquired Connectix Virtual PC and made it into a a standalone installation package which had to be installed separately from an installer that contained a Windows VHD image of a Windows XP machine called Windows XP Mode.

Windows XP Mode did not need to be activated online, since it relied upon a new version of Activation called OEM BIOS Locking.

The Microsoft Virtual PC software has a form of virtual BIOS which contains the activation key for Windows XP Mode, so after installation was complete within the Virtual PC instance it would autoactivate, or already be activated.

VirtualBox is a slightly more advanced virtual machine kit which comes from Oracle, but also runs on many Windows, Linux and MacOSX and MacOS platforms.

VirtualBox also has a way of loading a BIOS image if dumped from a running systems memory using a tool like SLIC Toolkit. By modifying the dumped image and adjusting the Virtual Machine Settings using the VBoxmanage.exe tool to load it.. the Windows XP Mode image can be loaded into Virtualbox on not only Windows, but Linux, MacOSX and MacOS.. 

The Windows XP Mode VHD must be converted first however using the VBoxmanage tool to clonehd the image and export it as format VDI.

The placement of the BIOS activation string within the modified BIOS dump also moves around slightly from VBox 4.0 to 5.1-5.22 to 6.0 by a single or more bytes. The BIOS is compiled differently for each version of VBox. This technique is known to work on those versions, but the latest version is 7.0 and it is not known if it can still be made to work on that version.

VirtualBox is also know for supporting USB pass thru and offers a more robust long term way of supporting XP SP3 as activated on more varied and modern os platforms in the current year.